Monday, December 05, 2005
how often are you approached in a bustling and crowded ngee ann city coffee bean outlet by a crew to be asked if your drink tastes good? that happened to mandy and i last tuesday. i actually already caught him eyeing, possibly, mandy when he was filling up the straw dispenser. he must have wanted so bad just to talk to her. however, his attempt only managed to make mandy giggle. she didn't say a word. aww...
michelle: when you see a group of men together like them (referring to a group of men dressed in corporate style), they must be chauvinistic.
mandy: they must be what? GAY?
michelle: (
laughs) well, that kind of fits too.
last wednesday, mandy had a tennis match at kallang tennis centre. i think i might have just walked pass the very adorable, charming gregory who participated in the debut episode of the season one of singapore's brainiest kid back in 2003. he is really tall and has lost a bit of the childhood innocence, but he managed to preserve his charm. what a suave, good looking male adolescent now. haha. he is seeded second in the spex under-14 tennis tournament and ranks 7th in singapore's under-14 tennis category. bradley lai is ranked 9th in singapore's under-12 tennis category. how impressive!!
saturday night was a full-fledge feministic bitching session. it was a pity my favourite bitching partner, samantha, wasn't around. i felt really honoured to be able to be one of the few non-family-related people to be driven by shuowen. she drove mitch, wanshan, eileen, marie anne and i out for dinner. way cool to be driven by a friend because i've always been the one driving friends around. haha. the night was actually a launch party mer's sister organised for her clothing line. but turned out, the few of us and xinyu (who came rather late) just chilled at a corner with some chips and started gossiping. that's what girls do best. yay, can't wait for christmas party!! (:
alas, goodbye to lnat!! say, l-nat!! haha. whatever it is called, i am free from that. i hope i didn't do badly though. the thirty mcqs were horrible to say the least. and they only allocated a miserable forty minutes to write an essay. i chose the essay about charity conferring benefits more to the giver than the receiver. i kind of wrote that benefit cannot be measured because people have different pespectives. if you give a meagre sum of money to the tsunami victims, to you it might be insignificant, but to them it might be the drive to live. okie, the undergraduate offices of the universities can now begin to mock at my juvenile essay. (:
&
hush pretty pink lady ;
at 5:39 pm
